Talk:Qualcomm Snapdragon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sovereign Sentinel (talk · contribs) 08:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

I will review this. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 08:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Checklinks: no dead links. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 08:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * "The Snapdragon system on chip (SOC) was announced in November 2006" - shouldn't that be SoC instead?
 * ✅ CorporateM (Talk) 14:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * "It also collaborated with Microsoft to optimize Windows 8 for Snapdragon semiconductors.[52]" Maybe Windows Phone 8 would be more accurate and offer higher clarity?
 * ✅ CorporateM (Talk) 14:10, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * "The current Snapdragon naming schema was implemented" - clearly a typo.
 * Not sure what you mean. Naming Schema appears to be a pretty common phrase Spelling appears to be correct CorporateM (Talk) 14:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * My mistake… ✅ sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 16:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I would recommend removing the Specifications section entirely. It is the only section of the article that is not stable, only relies on sources from the Qualcomm website, is biased towards WP:RECENTISM, and is redundant to content already in List of Qualcomm Snapdragon devices.
 * I fully support this, but I also know if I do it someone will come out of the woodworks accusing me of censoring technical specs (yes this really does happen). Do you mind doing the honors? WP:COI prohibits me from making any potentially controversial edits. CorporateM (Talk) 14:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 16:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

I am placing this article on hold. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)