Talk:Quality assurance/Archives/2015

Entire article talks about Testing which is Quality Control (QC) rather than Quality Assurance (QA)
If someone says:

"The entire article talks about TEsting and the various types of testing with little or no adequate reference to Quality Assurance which primarily is the set of activities (including facilitation, training, measurement and analysis) needed to provide adequate confidence that processes are established and continuously improved in order to produce products or services that conform to requirements and are fit for use. I strongly suggest that the detailed descriptions regarding types of testing to be removed and Quality Assurance concepts are included. The TESTING related information can be added as part of Quality Control page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aravindan Shanmugasundaram (talk • contribs) 04:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But isn't it all part of Quality management and should thus be merged? SandyWA (talk) 09:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)"

Too general?
In my opinion, the article is very general - which is good on the one hand, but it lacks specific fields of application. Every industry has its own model of quality assurance or let's say quality management. Maybe it should be merged with Quality management or industries in particular? Any opinions? SandyWA (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Frankly I would suggest to go deeper into real life examples, a case study perhaps, to make it easier for the new comers in this field! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.40.131.51 (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)