Talk:Quality press

The link for the 'i' newspaper is very difficult to click
Any way around this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.69.42 (talk) 12:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

And The Independent?
The Independent is mentioned twice in the article but not included in the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samer.hc (talk • contribs)


 * That's because the first paragraphs were written when the Independent was still printing on paper, while the table was added after it had moved to online-only. The Independent is still recognized as quality journalism, but that's a concept which would be better covered by a British equivalent to News media in the United States, which doesn't currently seem to exist.


 * The closest I can find is Mass media in the United Kingdom, but that article is split up by medium and doesn't give a coherent view of British journalism as a whole. In fact, its "Newspapers" section basically duplicates the quality press article, except that it does include the Independent in its table as a "former broadsheet newspaper". But it doesn't include equally-respected sources like BBC News, which has never published on paper, but which is now in the same category as the Independent for many practical purposes. So there's a lot of scope for improvement here. Smyth (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Unsourced?
The two sources for this article are the definition of the word quality, and a 404 error that I can't find an archive of. I did a brief search, but the best I could pull up was mostly just vague definitions in online dictionaries. Are there any articles or books that actually source the definition of the term, or any of the entries on the list? Parabolist (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)