Talk:Quantum finance

Too technical?
I've added the 'Technical' tag as I thought this article assumes too much prior knowledge for a general audience. It reads a little like an academic literature review - is this its origin? I wonder whether using more real-world examples, and fleshing out the lede, might make it easier for a general reader to get into the article? Docben (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Someone appears to have conflated these pricing computations with some Q Anon "Quantum Financial System" nonsense. The introduction paragraph may now be misleading. I don't have the knowledge to correct the intro paragraph or the ability to restore the previous article. Just wanted to call attention to whoever may be able to address this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.95.242 (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Deleted section "Instrument pricing"
The section "Instrument pricing" has one reference completely unrelated to "quantum finance", it's just a claim about quantum computing. The rest of the section amounts to "gee if quantum computing works out it would be great for financial computing". It's WP:OR and off topic anyway. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)