Talk:Quantum healing

Discussion Please
Hello all, I would like to initiate a discussion on this topic. I do not think it is fairly portrayed in even the slightest, remotest way. It certainly does not "improve the coverage of alternative medicine." In fact, it debunks this alternative medical approach entirely as "psuedoscience."

How can we have an honest, open dialogue on this topic?

with love, Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexanderDunlop (talk • contribs) 16:02, 10 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi there. Any discussion needs to take place within the context of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Two which apply in particular here are WP:MEDRS and WP:FRINGE. In that context I think we do currently have a reasonable neutral article. Alexbrn talk 16:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Any fair portrayal of "quantum healing" must make it clear that it is pseudoscience. To do otherwise would be dishonest. But the article is as polite as possible about it, and even points out how popular Deepak Chopra is. Maproom (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

bullshit. completely biased, dripping with negativity. it's okay to include criticism of a topic in an article but when all the relevant information available in the article revolves around that criticism, the article is useless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.148.39.248 (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * What else do you want to see? "People abusing words from physics" is what "quantum healing" is about. --mfb (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * "dripping with negativity" well, this a medical topic and people may get hurt, if the information is too positive.--Geysirhead (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)