Talk:Quantum healing/Archive 1

Creation
This page used to redirect to Quantum mysticism. We have been in great discussion about that page and its health. It was suggested that quantum mysticism be renamed to quantum metaphysics. In doing so, user::Likebox, rightly suggested that it would lose the inherent meaning behind or suggested of "quantum mysticism" and that article would likely no longer be relevant. To address that concern, I withdrew my request to rename the page and will be taking a different approach. Quantum mysticism should then document the "mysticism" of those that practice or adhere to that doctrine. Quantum healing is a separate thing from that altogether, as it may be a metaphysical concept that is not yet been substantially proven to be effective or true, but has subjective value to some or is being practiced today, regardless. The point is, quantum healing is a separate concept from quantum mysticism and should be documented in its own way, with its own history, criticisms, and claims. Quantum mysticism is, well I do not know exactly what that is, but I know that it is not quantum healing. It may be the underlying belief behind where quantum healing comes from, but it certainly is not quantum healing itself. For courtesy, I have put a link template pointing to the quantum mysticism article while we are all under construction. I plan to come back here and make substantial contributions to this article as well. -- ☯ Lightbound ☯   talk   17:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Academic info about the topic......
--222.64.212.180 (talk) 02:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?as_q=quantum+healing&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en

Info about the topic of....
Quantum touch --222.64.212.180 (talk) 02:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+quantum+touch&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0

Climbing up
This is now at third place on google, so it is important that we get it up to a good standard quickly. Look at the page view statistics - they are growing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesx12345 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Does this need an article of its own?
We already have quantum mysticism, of which this is one iteration. Is there enough out there on this particular flavor to justify a separate article? -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  21:24, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This is virtually the same topic as Energy medicine. I would suggest a merge in that direction instead, IRWolfie- (talk) 21:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Missuse of the word "Quantum" paragraph
Is that paragraph needed?

I just don't use to see in the wiki stuff like this, to me it's an opinion, that should be left to the reader to do, in my opinion.

186.38.21.55 (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC) fran (santaf gmail  c )


 * It seems sourced and the source makes that criticism. — Paleo  Neonate  – 19:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

seriously!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.148.39.248 (talk) 05:17, 13 January 2019 (UTC)