Talk:Quartier Colonel Dio/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 14:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * It is now the home of the ..... by forest on its other sides; all these sentences are not mentioned in the prose, hence are un-referenced.
 * Add the fields about air force and army clearly (out of GA criteria)


 * Section 1;
 * Maintain consistency "13th Fighter Wing" or "Fighter Wing 013"
 * Fighter Wing 013 members lived was stationed on the base until the unit disbanded on June 23, 1995
 * or, Fighter Wing 013 operated from the base until the unit disbanded on June 23, 1995
 * Soviet Union governments; What do you mean by government"s"? better just be "the Soviet Union" as it is always referred
 * Link "Mirage" on the first mention
 * the unit destroyed 273 enemy aircraft; can you mention different wars/campaigns/operations they were involved in?
 * the base turned to Air Defense -> the base was restructured for air defense
 * with The Fighter Squadron -> with the Fighter Squadron
 * the base became redesignated for French Army barracks Quartier Colonel Dio
 * What about the army's activities from the base from 2010 to till date?
 * 35.1% confidence, I suggest you to rephrase some of the sentences.
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 15:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Failing the article as there is no response from the nominator. THe nominator has not responded even after putting the article on hold, and also notifying on talk page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Failing the article as there is no response from the nominator. THe nominator has not responded even after putting the article on hold, and also notifying on talk page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Failing the article as there is no response from the nominator. THe nominator has not responded even after putting the article on hold, and also notifying on talk page. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)