Talk:Quartz (publication)

Article Reads Like the About Page
A lot of this article reads like an advertisement or an about page for this service and does not seem to come from an encyclopedic or neutral point of view. 50.141.33.124 (talk) 06:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Agree. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed or tagged some weakly-sourced material. The article instead be sourced to stronger sources, such as:

Rolf H Nelson (talk) 15:51, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * http://fortune.com/2015/05/15/media-quartz-api/
 * http://fortune.com/2016/01/21/quartz-growth/
 * https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/the-story-behind-atlantic-owner-david-bradleys-biggest-business-failure/2017/03/31/f612fe5c-13c2-11e7-833c-503e1f6394c9_story.html
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/24/business/media/quartz-introduces-atlas-a-search-engine-for-its-charts.html
 * So is the advertisement template still relevant? I'm not really seeing a problem at the moment, as the article doesn't exactly have an 'awards' or 'recognition' section...Donkey Hot-day (talk) 18:35, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it is still relevant. Pages can have awards and/or recognition sections, those are not necessarily problematic. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I think we can safely remove the advert template at this point. MHS371 (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Who owns it?
Who owns it? BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

"Quartz (magazine)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Quartz (magazine) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 11 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The outcome was keep; FOUR reasoned votes to keep, and the nomination was (only) because someone questioned whether it was a magazine or a an online news website or possibly (merely) a weblog/blog. The winning argument was these types of sites evolve, and that WP:RS such as WashPost, BBC, The Economist refer to/cite them, all as magazine, not a publication, and also that redirects "are cheap" (re computer resources). Nuts240 (talk) 05:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

QZ vs. UA: dropping reason for why QUARTZ was so-named
A convenience sample of English text, when deDuped, showed 101 QU words and 67 words with UA but not having a Q before the U. Visualize has a Z but no Q, and has UA; so does Actualize. The article's citing of a Press Release as to why it was so-named is not a reason to keep this information. As to who their initial employees were and their prior work record, that needs WP:RS. Nuts240 (talk) 01:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)