Talk:Quasi-delay-insensitive circuit

TODO

 * In formal synthesis, add and reference other production rule generation algorithms
 * In chips, add and reference a larger variety of QDI processors, and add descriptions to existing ones
 * More in-depth descriptions of each logic family
 * In syntax-directed translation, add reference to the tangram compiler
 * References and other approaches to verification
 * add a section for QDI gate and trasistor sizing (the optimal PN ratio for QDI is different than typical sizing)


 * I completed all of the previous TODO's and made sure to keep MOS:CAPS, I figured that the article is no longer a stub and that other issues have been resolved. Let me know if you think there are some things missing before this can happen. Ned Bingham (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Sounds good, but see MOS:CAPS and avoid capping things that are not proper names; i.e., it's weak condition half buffer (WCHB); or more likely weak-condition half buffer (WCHB). Dicklyon (talk) 05:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Chat
I'm a PhD student in Rajit Manohar's research group, so my perspective on QDI circuits will primarily be framed within the sphere of influence of Alain Martin and his students at Cal-tech namely Rajit Manohar, Steven Burns, Tony Lee, Steven Nowick, and Andrew Lines. Other perspectives are greatly desired! Ned Bingham (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * And note that Caltech does not need a hyphen. Alain is an old bud of mine. Dicklyon (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Unusual footnotes style
May it worth to use more conventional, numeric style footnotes? Citations grouped by name feel very unconfortable... Somehow. Any objections? AXO NOV (talk) ⚑ 21:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * No objections, go for it :) Ned Bingham (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)