Talk:Quatloos.com/Archives/2017

Stub
Any objections to me removing stub status? I know, it's actually smaller, but there really isn't much on Quatloos! in RS, so there's not much scope to expand it. Sure, if someone wants to chase down the Playboy article, we could add that, and there's the OnlineInvestor article, if it can be found. However, neither have anything that the PC Magazine and Forbes sources don't. Bromley86 (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Done, changed to C. I'll ask the relevant Wikiprojects to review to get it bumped to A.  Bromley86 (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject quality scale
I've asked the two WikiProjects to consider bumping this from C to A. It's definitely a notable site (see references), but there's just not a lot out there in RS about it. What there is is reflected in the article, so there's no real scope to expand it, IMO. I could shoehorn a basic Lead in to create the Lead/Body, but that seems unnecessary. Bromley86 (talk) 00:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)