Talk:Quazzy mark

No history of standard usage
It might be better to eliminate this article entirely. How does one do that?

The term "quazzy mark" has no history of standard usage. It appears to be a very recent invention. (this previous in-article comment by: 69.109.177.151)

I've never heard of it myself and it certainly doesn't have any search engine presence outside of sources that seem related to wikipedia. This is hardly conclusive though. Anyone else who knows better can weigh in ... -Onceler 18:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

To the contrary, it seems highly conclusive. The term should be regarded as a fabrication unless evidence can be provided for its inclusion.


 * The article has no links in, and is only a redirect to Inverted question mark and exclamation point in Spanish. If you think it should be deleted, raise the issue at WP:RfD. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)