Talk:Queen's Hall/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk • contribs • count ) 11:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Will begin read through in next 6 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Intro


 * No infobox? How about one with a pin map showing location? Not essential but would help. At least say in the intro where the theatre was located.
 * I hate infoboxes, and avoid them except where they are compulsory. I'll amend the intro as you suggest. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Now done. Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * "The hall had drab decor and cramped seating but superb acoustics." This appears subjective.
 * These points are covered in more detail (with refs) in the main text. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Construction

"In the centre of the arena there was a fountain containing pebbles, goldfish and waterlilies.[10] According to the conductor Sir Thomas Beecham, "Every three or four minutes some fascinating young female fell into the fountain and had to be rescued by a chivalrous swain. It must have happened thirty-five times every night. Foreigners came from all parts of Europe to see it."[11] At the top of the building, adjoining the conservatory, was the Queen's Small Hall, seating 500, for recitals, chamber-music concerts and other small-scale presentations. In July 1894, Bernard Shaw described it as "cigar-shaped with windows in the ceiling, and reminiscent of a ship's saloon … now much the most comfortable of our small concert rooms".[5] The hall provided modern facilities, open frontage for carriages and parking room, a press room, public spaces and bars.[12]"

There is inconsistency with full stops in or outside of quotes throughout the article. Please adopt a consistent format.
 * Excellent point. I'll proof-read carefully and amend. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Now done. (23 changes! whoops!) Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Second World War

Please wikilink St George's Hotel, dabbed appropriately. If its a red link I'll look into starting it myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you are ahead of me. I salute you. Tim riley (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for these comments, all very much to the point. I'll take action as mentioned above later today. Tim riley (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Sehr gut! Meets requirements. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)