Talk:Queen Bebe

Plot
The plot summary is overly long, and is in danger of being a blow by blow account of the episode (and might be breachng copyright). Per WP:EPISODE, it needs to be trimmed down - Tiswas (t) 17:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not 100% sure how that can happen, but I do intend to add a second image. Or perhaps a third, if I decide not to combine two of them into one. DanTD 17:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not the inclusion of images, but the sheer volume of content - It seems to be a scene by scene description, rather than a synopsis or summary - Tiswas (t) 21:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it's not as if I haven't tried to shorten it just enough, because I have. But most of what I've written is crucial to the story. DanTD 15:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The manual of style is as good a place to start as any. The purpose of the plot summary is to summarise, not to indiscriminately document the entire story. Any notion of being crucial to the plot is irrelevant, and arguably POV. I would prefer to leave it to you to trim the article, although if you are unable to, I'm more than happy to assist - Tiswas (t) 16:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Here is an excelent example of a plot summary. - Tiswas (t) 16:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, this may seem odd to you, but that's too short. If I wanted something like that, I'd just stay on the list of episodes. DanTD 20:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If anything, the brevity is an indiciation of the importance of the subject matter (though the two should not be conflated). WP:NOT dictates that the goal is to contextualise an episode, not recount it. The lack of sourced analysis is not an excuse to pad an episode article with descriptive prose. - Tiswas (t) 08:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, and forgive me here if I misrepresent you, it is not a question of you wanting "something like that", but whether the subject matter lends itself being best summarised, per wikipedia's guidelines & policies. Wikipedia is a tertiary source of information. - Tiswas (t) 09:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Bra trivia?
Do we really need a trivia item to say that Kim doesn't wear a bra? We already know from a number of episodes that she either doesn't wear one or she wears clothes with built in support. For example when you see her and Monique changing clothes in CB's dressing rooms and she changes her top and you see her from the shoulders up, or when she wears summer or strapless dresses.

perfectblue 17:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not so sure it's necessary, but it is interesting. That scene did fuel a lot of speculation regarding how she deals with her developing body parts. DanTD 20:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Ot's not a big deal. She wears strapless dresses in several scenes, so it's obvious that she makes other arrangements at least some if the time. I'm sure that she would wear a sports bra during cheer practice though (if she were a real perosn, that is). Looking at it another way, if her mother had grabbed her top and it had shown her bra, it would probably have gotten complaints from parents.


 * Of course if it had been a Japanese or a European show, she could have been walking around in her underwear and nobody would have really noticed.


 * perfectblue 18:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)