Talk:Queen Lupa

Did you know nomination
Did you know nominations/Pico Sacro

20 minute review for Women in Green editathon
Hello! As requested, here is a 20-minute assessment of this article's readiness for GA status.

The first thing to note is that this is short. Both by byte-count and word-count, it's only just outside the hundred shortest GAs, and while there is no formal requirement that a GA have any particular length, some reviewers may consider that it is just too short to pass at all – there is still no consensus on whether that's a valid reason not to promote. At any rate, the shortness of the article means that it might well be scrutinised more thoroughly than a longer article which "looks" more like a GA would be.

Structurally, I don't like the article as it is at the moment. I don't think §Background accurately describes what that section covers, and I think having almost all of the article in a single section, followed by a one-sentence §In popular culture section is a sign of poor organisation. More significantly for GA status, the lead does not currently summarise the article content, and the content about the Golden Legend is not found in the body of the article: this violates MOS:LEAD and consequently criterion 1b. My suggestion here would be to re-divide the article into sections on §Legend (covering the first two paragraphs of the current §Background section and adding a mention of the Golden Legend, and Legacy, which would cover the final paragraph of §Background and the §In popular culture section.

Looking at sourcing, I would be prepared to answer the following questions:


 * Who are TranslatioMedia (currently source #2) and why are they a reliable source
 * Why is Xacopedia a reliable source? Their about page talks about Web 2.0 and users expanding their articles; does this not fail WP:UGC?
 * Why is the tweet by Manuel Gago Marino an acceptable use of self-published sources?

Glancing at the sources, Pazos (2016) seems to talk quite a bit about art depicting the myth: is there anything to say about that in the article?

Hope this is useful! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 17:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. BTW, you comments sparked some curiosity in me. I looked at Good article statistics and Database reports/Good articles by size/4. Queen Lupa is currently at 2671 B (449 words) "readable prose size". At this moment it would be 39191 of 39707 by word count and 39192 by 39707 by proze size --evrik (talk) 22:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)