Talk:Queen Maud Land

GA check
I am working my way through the Good articles listed at Places; having a quick look to see if they still meet the Good article criteria. I have reached this article. After I've had a quick look, I'll leave a note here. In general, initially I look to see if there are obvious issues: maintenance tags, unsourced sections, excessive media, etc, and if so, if this can be resolved quickly by myself. If it looks like there may be significant and/or several minor issues, I'll open a GAR to see the extent of the problems. If it looks like there are sufficient concerns to put the GA listing in jeopardy, and that significant work is needed to resolve the concerns, I will notify the main contributors to the article, and put the GAR on hold.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  19:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC) ✅ There are some short paragraphs, which inhibits flow, and is against the advice in WP:Layout, but nothing else stands out. Looks to be OK.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  17:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)