Talk:Queen Street light rail station

Against proposed deletion
I am against the proposed deletion of the Queen Street light rail station for a number of reasons. For one as it serves as a community information page which is at the ensence of the Wikipedia mission statement and provides information about the transport station. I understand and recognize the argument that it lacks any coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources and that the G:link page is a primary source however it forms part of a larger group of pages that give readers vital public transit information and the page is also part of an infobox station template that allows readers to easily go from one station to another. This infobox template is used on various public transport systems pages around the world and deleting this page would make it incomplete.

Secondly, it has a small but decent readership. In the past month over 50 people have accessed the Queen Street light rail station to gain information about the station. Queen Street Sation itself services a residential area and has no attractions or landmarks worth noting on the page however that should not mean that it is not meaningless and does not provide the public and community with relevant information.

I can work on expanding the article that will provide more references and sources to support the page's authenticity but I do not think the solution is to delete a relevant page about a light rail station that people access and read regularly to gain information.

Geramany (talk) 07:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I have now expanded the article and provided additional references to provide authenticity and reliability to improve on the issues raised by the deletion proposal reason quote - "lacks any coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. G:link is a primary source.' The article has now been improved and the issues raised have been corrected therefore the deletion propsal is no longer valid. Geramany (talk) 23:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)