Talk:Queen angelfish/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 19:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Reading now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Stating that, aside from Brazil, the species is not harvested too much in its range and the wild population appears to be stable.[1] – Sentence without noun, maybe needs to be combined with previous one.
 * Done. LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The bacteria Photobacterium damselae piscicida was isolated from its kidney, raising concerns that it could infect native fish.[25] – Does this mean that this bacterium (singular? bacteria is plural?) is specific for this fish, or that it is exclusively found in the western Atlantic? And, it would be ideal to have a paragraph on parasites?
 * Just that they could spread the disease. And the sources don't mention parasites LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I suggest to add that the disease was previously found to be absent in native fish in the Red Sea. This would highlight the importance of this discovery, and add necessary context. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. LittleJerry (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * A sentence stating if species-appropriate husbandry is even possible for pomacanthids of this size (I have read it is not).
 * The sources don't say. Just that they have certain requirements. LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * They are captured mostly for the aquarium trade, where they are abundant and highly valued – Isn't "abundant" a bit too much? They reach 45 cm and don't even fit into most private aquaria?
 * Removed. LittleJerry (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Very nice read, only few issues. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)