Talk:Quercus douglasii

It would be nice if the page showed that they are deciduous... 76.126.54.65 (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Notes to article's first assessing
Even tho the length of the article places it in stub class, this is a moderately important tree due to its assoication with California as one of the small number of widely distributed native trees in the state. Suzanbanthony 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Quercus douglasii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130526020933/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/gt2/artspec_information.asp?thingid=85046 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/gt2/artspec_information.asp?thingid=85046

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quercus gambelii not a synonym
I'm removing Quercus gambelii as a synonym, because altho it appears in the source, Q. gambelii is a separate species found hundreds of miles farther East. Also, the source traces to the Kew World Checklist, which mentions a source that doesn't accept it as a synonym: However, if need be we could include it with an appropriate disclaimer. Benny White (talk) 22:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Do note the crucial author abbreviation at the end. Quercus gambelii Liebm. is a synonym of Quercus douglasii Hook. and Arn., but Quercus gambelii Nutt. is not. — Eru·tuon 22:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Good to know, thanks! I added a clarifying note to the article rather than removing it. Benny White (talk) 23:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. I think having the note will be helpful. — Eru·tuon 02:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)