Talk:Quesnel River

Fixes
I think I'm going to not only fix up the geobox for the Quesnel, but also fix up the text. There is a lot of good info but it is quite disorganised; tributaries, sources, you name it...     needs to be organized a bit. Also, is there a way anyone could make it so there isn't a huge gap between the "history" section & the main section about the river itself. That gap makes it look really retarded. AndrewEnns (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * All fixed up, a photo is the next thing needed for the article. A good place to take a picture of the river would probably be from the bridge at 52.84222°N, -122.22472°W near Gravelle.  Also, Little & Big Canyon could use photos as well; I don't think anyone even looks at both of those stubs these days since they are lacking information.  Putting a photo on a page is one way to get people to look at an article more. AndrewEnns (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)