Talk:Quiet Company

Fair use rationale for Image:Shinehonesty.jpg
Image:Shinehonesty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Article Restructuring
Making an attempt to restructure the article in a more standard format. Still a work in progress. The article overall is a mess honestly and is all over the place as far as duplicate information and contradictions. Will attempt to pars this as well to make the article more coherent. Tkasmai (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Completed the bulk of article restructuring. This basically set a History major section in place and then segregated the existing information into two date categories, with some following sections addressing related content. I added quite a few new citations and am in the process of bringing inadequately specified citations up to snuff. Overall, I tired to eliminate what I thought to be conjecture, opinion and otherwise "flowery" language and tried to eliminate overlap and discontinuities. I think there are still some issues with overall article flow and narrative, but will continue to pick on those to improve. I think we are close to being able to remove the tag referencing article issues - but will complete all improvements and "poll" the talk page for the removal of the tag to see if there are any objections. Tkasmai (talk) 15:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Removal of Multiple Issue banner and section citation banner
Based on the recent edits and effort to restructure the article in a more standardized format, I believe the article can now have these banners removed. There are still a few needed citations (but just a few) and the structure issue has now been resolved, in my opinion. In posting this - I plan to leave this as open discussion to be had here on the talk page for 1 week - and if no objections are presented then I will remove the banner. Tkasmai (talk) 14:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Received no objections to removing the issues banner - removed as of today. Any discussions regarding adding back the banners can be had here. Tkasmai (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)