Talk:Quigley Down Under

Untitled
I've never seen the movie fully through so I am unsure of the terminology used within the film but in Australia (where I live) a large property (in the order of a thousand square kilometres, can be orders of magnitude greater or smaller) is called a 'station' not a 'ranch'. If the plot description does not follow the script in using the term ranch then it should possibly be changed. TasDave 08:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC) It's in the script, Just before arriving, Quigley asks when they will get to the "Ranch" and he is told they've been on it for 2 days —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.25.108.3 (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Quigley, being American, uses the American terminology while the Australian characters use that of Australia. Wschart (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:70m.jpg
Image:70m.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Quigley Down Under. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.film.greatsouthcoast.com.au/region/showcase.php?id=17
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722001511/http://www.ahafilm.info/movies/moviereviews.phtml?fid=6449 to http://www.ahafilm.info/movies/moviereviews.phtml?fid=6449

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Anachronism
If it's set in the 1860s, it's impossible for him to have an 1874 Sharps catridge rifle. No dates are actually given in the film, and the complete lack of other cartridge weapons is very anachronistic to the point of a flaw.Mzmadmike (talk) 04:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Meat pie Westerns

 * I've just spent an awful lot of time on reading up on Meat pie Westerns, (especially since I'm not a particular fan of any kind of Western - got dragged into it via two other articles) and updating that article as per what I could find about the genre. If you read up there, and this citation amongst others, you will see that this film has been categorised thus. I don't feel strongly about it but just don't have the time/energy to add more to this article now. I don't think that your revert was justified without reading up first - I made the change with some justification and after a lot of work. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:20, 24 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The film does not meet the criteria given in the Wikipedia article on meat-pie Westerns. Its historical period is ambiguous and its main focus is on the superiority of the American ethos to the Australian (which was questionable then, anyway, and would hardly be endorsed by Australians at any time), both in terms of the script and of the ranch-owner's fixation on the Western. The film's inclusion in a newspaper article (by a historical correspondant, not a film critic) is hardly conclusive. If there is a trustworthy Australian source that includes the film, that would be. Sweetpool50 (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)