Talk:Quinto Sol

Untitled
this sucks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.5.27 (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Tag Explanation
I have to profoundly disagree with the poster in the above section, who wrote that eight years ago. Though to be fair, I'm sure there have been many helpful improvements since then (admittedly, I haven't checked the revision history yet).

I think this article is pretty good. Sourcing appears adequate, prose is passable, and it reads moderately well overall. Definitely has an encyclopaedic tone. Kudos to the author(s) on that front.

That being said, the prose could use a little polishing, for more clarity and flow. It's a minor fix. Also, important terms need to be bluelinked, and that's beyond easy. Some illustration would definitely enhance the article as well. I've already found at least one image which would be appropriate to the subject. Bringing it overall into full MOS compliance is a bit trickier, but should present no major obstacles.

I'll be happy to do this as time allows. Pretty much what I would do for an AfC submission, so it's in my wheelhouse.

Anyway, good job overall. Glad I have the opportunity to possibly help make it better. After the revision(s), I'll submit it for GA evaluation. I can't promise that I'll get to this immediately, as I'm a bit, and sometimes sporadic (or even manic) when editing, but no worries- it'll be done. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 05:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Cultural apropiation to be successful
the solar calendar in Mexico 300 years B.C. That is the fift sun we live in? . Is the very offensive China, USA and also Mexicans make a jock of this history and sacred for natives. Why is this in Wikipedia? Shame all of you. 2001:1C00:2615:4A00:ACB6:5C30:F9:7441 (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2024 (UTC)