Talk:Quiznos/Archive 1

False Statements
There are many false statements in this article. Subway DOES toast their sandwiches, Subway DOES sell salads and soup, and unlike Quiznos, Subway DOES Bake their own bread in the store. Quiznos bread is all frozen.
 * In either case, I see someone's done the fixing already. Krupo 04:21, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Yea but all of Quiznos meats are freshly sliced and loaded with saturated fat and cholesterol, where as subway uses packeged meats that is good for you... so there plus quiznos is a hell of alot worse than subway! Boo-YAH!

Unless you can provide evidence of this, you should not say that. [this is remo451 I just forgot my password) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.88.143 (talk) 01:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The Name
''Quiznos? Could they think of a worse name for a sub shop? Why don't they just cut the crap and call themselves Gay Men Eat Here Subs? ~Seanbaby''

I am considering placing some not so flattering information backed up by secondary evidence about some franchisee woes. Apparently there is a lot of discontent about this company's practices.Abu sme 07:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

What does Quizno's mean anyway? Or rather Who is Quizno? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.115.164 (talk • contribs)

Bacon
I've worked at Quizno's since Feb 2005 as something to do while I'm at school and have since worked my way up to manager while I was home from school this past summer. NEVER have I seen anything called "baconaise". We do have a product called "Bacon Alfredo Sauce" that only goes on the "Chicken Carbonara" sandwich. If a sandwich gets mayo, its regular old mayo, no additives. Furthermore, the remaining chicken sanwiches get Ranch, Honey Bourbon Mustard, Honey Mustard, Chipole Mayo, or Zesty Grille sauce. Darry2385 21:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Just saw a TV ad 4 October, 2006 wherein Quiznos proclaims that if thou art unhappy with the sandwich made for thee you get a second free sandwich. Isn't that nice. What if the second sandwich tastes worse than the first? I have tried their fare twice. That was enuff. The Mighty Obbop never returned. Heckaroni, I can concoct a better sandwich for half the cost. Obbop mumbled this in a lucid moment.209.50.1.73 02:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup
Despite the foregoing, the real problems with this article are the use of weasel words ("it has been suggested that..."), no explanation of the company name, and a listing of their menu (???) taking more space than the discussion of the company history. This ad needs a lot of work, including the addition of pertinent information, a rewrite to eliminate weaseliness, some legitimate sourcing, and elimination of the menu (which has no place in an encyclopedia, for cryin' out loud, and which changes so frequently that we would have to have an on-call rewrite team to handle it). Canonblack 16:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * They make great sandwiches, but their menu does not belong on Wikipedia. Deleted.  It'd be fine to link to the thing, but I agree with the above - it isn't pertinent to the point that it deserves a subsection of the article, and a pain to keep up to date. Fedallah 07:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Nutritional Information?
I've heard that Quiznos doesn't like to give out their nutritional information? --74.100.13.84 20:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes thats true. When I last worked, which was before classes resumed, all I had to show people about nutrition was an outdated list of subs w/ carb information.  On the website, they show full info for two subs  and provide a link to contact them about nutrition info. Darry2385 23:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I have added a section regarding nutritional information, but I don't know how to properly cite the sources. the links for said sources follow:

http://usfoodpolicy.blogspot.com/2006/03/quiznos-nutrition-facts-non-disclosure.html

http://www.foodfacts.info/blog/2006/03/still-no-nutrition-data-from-quiznos.html

I have PERSONALLY contacted Quiznos both via e-mail (several times) and telephone (both the toll-free numbers and the corporate offices of both U.S. and Canadian stores) and requested nutritional information, only to be told that that data was, "proprietary".

Their consistent refusal to offer this data is well-documented, and should be included in this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.233.215.0 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC-8)


 * This section was blanked by 71.230.12.145 (talk), but I reverted it since a consensus on whether or not to keep this section hasn't been reached. Darry2385 01:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The website no longer shows nutritional information for ANY subs. The page linked to in the article redirects to the home page.

Something wrong in the article
I think Puerto Ricos Quiznos stores are counted like US Quiznos stores,not international... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BoricuaPR (talk • contribs) 07:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC-8)

PR is a commonwealth (or is it a territory?) of the United States. Most companies count PR locations as US locations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.88.143 (talk) 01:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Mmmm...TOASTY!
You know what I don't get: the announcer says "mmm...mmm...mmm...mmm...mmm...(five times)" when the slogan clearly shows it four times. It's like an add on to the slogan. In fact, do the math here


 * M...m...m...m...m...TOASTY                     m... is used 5 times (ANNOUNCER)
 * M(...)m(...)m(...)m(...)TOASTY                 m(...) is used only 4 times (SLOGAN)

JustN5:12 00:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * This is interesting, and I've noticed it myself while watching the commercials. However, I don't see what impact it has on this article.  Darry2385 01:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * "Interesting" is the key word there! JustN5:12 03:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Might be a good addition to the article...
This photo, taken from February 2007 North America winter storm might be a good addition to the article. Think so? Dismas |(talk) 14:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It would appear that sign is now irrelevant. That location has closed . Darry2385 15:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

"It's not lacking any meat.. and that's what real women need"
It seems that the quiznos comercial that has a woman saying "It's not lacking any meat.. and that's what real women need", has gotten alot of attention and reaction on many blogs, forums, and other sites, and there is even a ytmnd site based on it. see this google search (with about 12000 hits) to see some of the attention the comercial has gotten. Should all the attention and reaction this comerical has recived be mentioned in the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.154.188.152 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC).


 * Blogs, forums are just people talking. a ytmnd site can be put together in seconds on anything, most seem that way. If you have credible cited sources of contorversy keep it in. Ive tagged it for sources now. If you can reword it or cite it from credible sources besides blogs and forums dealing with this so called controversy then it should stay otherwise given time it will be removed. --Xiahou 22:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A significant response, even if just from viewers, seems worth mentioning. I'm sure there are other sources beyond forums and blogs, but either way, significant public response is still notable. hundreds of blogs and fourms, YTMND sites, and YouTube videos that make fun of it, all show fairly significant public response.. seems notable to me. MasterGreenLantern 23:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but this cannot be included in the wikipedia article unless you have a better source. I tried to edit the Washington Mutual article to include information on their recent "banker's pen" commercials being racist because the 20-or-so boring, old-style bankers are all white, while the cool, younger spokesman, Bill, is black. A lot of blogs reflect this opinion, but unless a 'real' source includes it, it can not be included because the reference is not sufficient. Same applies to this situation. Furthermore, you do not even site a blog (which would still not be enough), rather you cite three google searches. Certainly does not count as research or a references. I have deleted the following:

Now reads: One of said commercials features a woman saying '"It's not lacking any meat, and that's what real women need."

Also deleted :

--Jon in Californoia 14 December 2007

End of the article
whats going on at the end of this article? The published values for the "small turkey lite" from the healthy menu show 1909 mg of sodium, which comes close to the U.S. recommended daily allowance. This is actually a cover-up, however, as the real reason for he lack of nutritional information is the presence of the AIDS virus in Quiznos seasonings. The Australian Quiznos, by contrast, publishes nutritional information Seeing as the bit about AIDS isn't cited, I think its just someone being nasty? -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.243.7.54 (talk • contribs).
 * I believe that you must be looking at an older version of the article. The current article doesn't go beyond the "daily recommended daily allowance" line.  Darry2385 22:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Etymology of the name Quiznos
I think that it would be helpful to include the origin of the name Quiznos in the article. 69.118.97.26 01:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As an employee, it's quite common knowledge that the word Quiznos is gibberish made up to sound cool (much like Kodak or other similiar brand names). However, there's no source or hard facts to back that up, as we heard it from our manager who heard it at Quiznos University in Denver, so I can't update the article with that information.72.197.141.202 07:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I work there too. It's just a made up name.  No rhyme or reason. Darry2385 13:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Refusal to release nutrition facts
This section contains the following self-contradictory sentence:

United States Quiznos consistently refuses to release the nutritional data of nearly all of its products.[12] Although, as of Nov. 2nd, 2007, all nutrition information is available at all Quiznos Subs locations.

Can we remove this sentence, or clarify it to make it less nonsensical?

24.107.186.229 22:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Chevalier3

Coyote
I can't think of why the material about the wandering coyote should be part of this article. It doesn't add anything to our knowledge of Quizno's -- heck, it doesn't even add anything to our understanding of coyotes. It's more like trivia than anything else, and I thought the article was improved without it. Accounting4Taste: talk 16:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with WikiProject Food and drink banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

NPOV
This article is blatantly negative, with the majority of it bad press articles and subjects that really are not encyclopedic. Should be rewritten in a better NPOV format. 74.204.40.46 (talk) 07:58, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree; if there's something I can do to help, let me know. Accounting4Taste: talk 14:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Quizno's or Quiznos?
Should this article be moved from "Quizno's" (with apostrophe) to "Quiznos" (no apostrophe)? The rest of the article, as well as the Quiznos.com web site, show it without an apostrophe. I don't know if this has been discussed before, and I am not comfortable moving pages without prior discussion. sme3 (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've always known it was w/o an apostrophe. The page used to be "Quiznos" b/c I tried to move it back to that, but I got a warning about something, so I gave up. Darry2385 (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Anthropodeus just tried to move the article by copy-pasting the text. I cleaned that up and requested an administrator move it to Quiznos since that does indeed appear to be the correct spelling of the name. Brian Powell (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Unexplained reversions
Shimgray reverted my recent contributions to the article, which described the most recent television advertising campaign that features the homosexual innuendo (well, it's rather blatant). Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.90.85 (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * ...wait, there is such an advertising campaign? I assumed that was lurid vandalism! Huh. Shimgray | talk | 17:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

YES, no kidding, I was completely serious. I also asked some friends in another part of the country if they saw it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.90.85 (talk) 01:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Citation for profitablity problems
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_18456035 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natediesel (talk • contribs) 20:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)