Talk:Rørvik Airport/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 23:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Rørvik Airport, Ryum's Norway Airlines, I TBrandley am your pilot today, we will be taking out in a few minutes to the Penticton Regional Airport. Enjoy the flight!


 * "five other regional airport" should be plural, missing an "s" at the end
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "along with for three" remove "for", unnecessary
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "announced on on" two "on"? Remove one
 * Would you prefer the first or the last removed? ;) Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "bus service to the airport" for more clearer prose I would add "available" between "service" and "to"
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * What's the point of table being sortable if there is only one item?
 * Ask the people who made the template. It's a standardized table designed by WikiProject Airports, although it is by far the most elegant on Wikipedia. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you ensure that the table meets WP:ACCESS for scope cols and rows
 * This uses a standardized template which is transcluded on every single airport article, so I'm not going to mess with it. WP:ACCESS and DTT are not part of the GA criteria so I would rather not pursue it any further. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you also ensure that it meets WP:DTT for table captions?
 * See above. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Any external links?
 * Official site is in the navbox. Arsenikk (talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Any related portals to this subject?
 * Added. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Great work overall. Once the above issues are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done! TBrandley 02:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and sorry for the slight delay. As I noted above, I used a standardized template for the table that doesn't meet any guideline but is within the scope of the GA criteria. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  18:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your very welcome. I will pass the article based on your changes now. TBrandley 23:15, 23 November 2012 (UTC)