Talk:R. E. Hillebrand

WP:Rumour, remove?
This seems to be not something that should be included in any article. It is merely a statement of a reliable source that one of two persons is speculated to be the brother of... That is not encyclopedic.--Müdigkeit (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP is based on secondary sources and Catty is, as you say, a reasonable source. It is Catty who puts this forward, and the text explicitly states that that is the case. WP:Rumour and WP: Crystal simply don't apply here. It's a simple statement of fact that Catty thought this to be true. Johnlp (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)