Talk:R. V. C. Bodley/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 02:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Article looks interesting. Will review it tomorrow where I'll have a lot of time for Wikipedia. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 02:00, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing, just letting you know while I believe the article is at GA standards, I am still in the process of making minor expansions to it. If you would like me to cease expanding the article until the review is complete, let me know. Cheers. Freikorp (talk) 04:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Your review initiation (which while very much appreciated came much sooner than I expected; normally I have to wait weeks for a review to start) has prompted me to exhaust all my sources and expand this article as much as possible as quickly as possible. Since you opened this review i've increased the characters of prose from about 5300 to about 8900, but rest assured i'm done now. I've pretty much covered everything I can, and i'll wait till the review is finished to add anything else. :) Freikorp (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Freikorp, the article looks much better now. My first suggestion would have been splitting in the article into more sections or at least subsections which I see you've done beautiful now. Will review the overall article in a bit. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 22:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Is it well-written? ✅
 * Is it verifiable with no original research? ✅
 * Is it broad in its coverage? ✅
 * Is it neutral? ✅
 * Is it stable? ✅
 * Is it illustrated? ✅
 * Freikorp, I found the article to be most interesting and somewhat flawless. I made some minor changes in the infobox per WP:DATERANGE, but overall, the article is very handsome; I recommend you start up a peer review as I'm sure it could get to FA-status without a war of copyediting. Good work. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 15:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)