Talk:R1 RCM

PR-like edits
Recently I have been reverting similar edits that are coming from a number of IP addresses and accounts. I don't think they are appropriate for Wikipedia because they sound like blatant PR. How blatant? A quick Google shows that some of the text was copied verbatim from this (copyrighted) letter from the president and CEO of the company: http://accretivehealth.com/ongoing-corporate-restructuring-continues-at-accretive-health/. Tdslk (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accretive Health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150704094805/http://accretivehealth.com/accretive-health-appoints-emad-rizk-m-d-as-president-and-ceo/ to http://accretivehealth.com/accretive-health-appoints-emad-rizk-m-d-as-president-and-ceo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

More conflict-of-interest PR edits
Much of this article was blanked on 2017-11-17, removing sourced but negative information about the company. This company appears to have done this before in the past, making conflict of interest edits to the article to replace unpleasant claims with marketing mumbo-jumbo. The name of the company apparently changed recently, so a straight revert won't necessarily work: I don't have time at the moment, but someone needs to restore the claim that are valid for this article. --Closeapple (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)