Talk:R7 (SEPTA)

Dab page
Same comment here as on Talk:R5 (SEPTA). This page doesn't seem to qualify as a dab page. A disambiguation page would mean that something is ambiguous, for instance a line called R7 in the US, and a line called R7 in the UK. That is not the case here. From what I understood, this article is concerning a former line that was split up. That doesn't make the line's name ambiguous. It was simply split up, and the article should reflect that. So someone in the know, please try to rewrite the article in that way. --Midas02 (talk) 06:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I was going to agree with you, until I realized just how large the current R7 dab page really is. -User:DanTD (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)