Talk:RAD@home Collaboratory

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Aru4wiki (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Hi, I have created a very short note only. Wikipedia is a page where public come for an authentic documentation. Citizen Science is a process where public participate in serious pursuit of knowledge. Research scientists do not care reading in wikipedia and public can not trust every newspaper or media-website articles. Hence, wikipedia is a bridge. RAD@home is a ten year old popular programme in India. Three research papers linked in the article should be reflection of its authenticity and importance. Nature-Index, International Astronomical Union, Square Kilometre Array Organisations etc have written about RAD@home and I felt that is enough. I did not write much about all these but just 4 lines. If you still feel like deleting, go ahead, u may be an authority in wikipedia. But ask yourself, why wikipedia was created and why it could grow...