Talk:RBL Bank

Note
Ratnakar Bank has re-branded to RBL Bank

(180.179.116.20 (talk) 10:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC))

Request to update 'History' section
Hi! In an attempt to clean up this article, I would like to suggest some changes in it starting from the 'History' section. As noted in my User page and above on this Talk page, I have a conflict of interest in this subject as part of my ongoing work at Performics.Convonix. Due to this, I will not be editing the article directly, and instead will be requesting changes here to volunteer editors. Thank you for all the help in advance. Please feel free to get in touch with me in case of anything.

I'll start with changes in the 'History' section as noted below (along with references for each paragraph) -

Current:

Suggested:

Explanation: Copyediting, removal/addition of information, addition of references.

Please let me know if I can be of any more help. Thanks. Convo Agent One (talk) 10:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Reply 15-FEB-2019

 * The requested sections have largely been implemented. Certain aspects of the information were omitted for brevity.
 * The COI editor's use of color to distinguish the current sections of text from the proposed sections within their request was efficient and very much appreciated.

Regards,  Spintendo   16:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Sections of text which were unreferenced were omitted.
 * 2) Awards which dealt with subjects that weren't independently notable in Wikipedia were omitted.
 * 3) Certain sections were renamed and/or consolidated with other sections.
 * 4) The advertise maintenance template was removed.
 * , thank you for your valuable help. I appreciate it greatly. I look forward to suggest more changes to the article. Convo Agent One (talk) 08:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Request to renameadjust sections, content omission
Hello! Further in my attempt to clean up/expand this article, I would like to request a few suggestions. As noted before on this page, I have a conflict of interest with this article. Hence, I will not be editing it directly. Here are the suggestions:


 * Move the forth paragraph starting "In the 2010s,..." and ending "...1680 Cr." to a new section that can be titled "Investments" or "Funding".


 * Explanation: The content is more relevant under such a heading.


 * In the "Operations" section, remove the following lines of content:
 * Then rename the section as "Financial performance". The newly created section "Investments"/"Funding" can be placed below this.
 * Then rename the section as "Financial performance". The newly created section "Investments"/"Funding" can be placed below this.
 * Then rename the section as "Financial performance". The newly created section "Investments"/"Funding" can be placed below this.


 * Explanation: Unencyclopedic content about the subject's financial performance. Pruned content is relevant under the new heading.


 * Move the line "" to a new section titled "Operations".
 * Explanation: Encyclopedic content that is relevant under "Operations" and requires further expansion.


 * Move the three bullet points to a new section titled "Initiatives".
 * Explanation: Relevant to such a new heading.


 * Rename the section "Reception" as "Awards".
 * Explanation: More appropriate heading.

Please let me know in case the suggestions are incorrect or if there's a need for more information. Thank you. Convo Agent One (talk) 09:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Reply 28-MAR-2019
Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request. Spintendo 10:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for implementing the valid changes, . I appreciate it greatly. I will suggest more changes that will further help us improve the article. Convo Agent One (talk) 07:43, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Request to Update #3
Hello! This is a follow-up to my previous COI edit requests. Following are my suggestions -


 * Create a new section titled "Financials". The term roughly translates to "financial situation of a company".
 * Move the following part from "History" to the newly created section "Financials".
 * Move the following part from "Operations" to "Financials".
 * Add the following content at the top of "Operations"
 * Create a new section titled "Stock market listing" or "Initial public offering" and add the following.
 * Run WP:Refill.

Please let me know in case of any queries in the requests. Thank you. Convo Agent One (talk) 11:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Reply 31-MAY-2019
Regards, Spintendo  14:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) It was previously stated that a financial section was not ideal, in that naming the subsection as Financials would center the information contained in it around the expectation of an outcome indicator, i.e., the performance of some financial aspect of the information — such as whether or not that performance met expectations. This type of activity, whereby the financial health of the company is discussed, is not the purpose of the article (or if it is, it's a function already performed by the communication of financial statistics in the infobox). In any event, the article's main text should not focus on the evaluation of financial performances suggested by this subheading's title.
 * 2) "RBL Bank services large corporations, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and agricultural, retail, and low-income customers." This proposed sentence conflicts slightly with the second sentence of the lead section.
 * 3) The information regarding the bank's NSE and BSE status is already listed in the infobox.
 * 4) The date of the IPO is not confirmed in the provided source.
 * 5) WP:Refill did not suggest any changes.


 * Reply starts here:

1. Referring a good article where such a section has been added. Is there another way to add such information even if it can be decided that it should be added? 2. Sure. I suggest removing that line completely from the lead and adding this new line under 'Operations'. Since the lead section is the summary of the entire body of the article, I figured this should be added in the body too. The lead can be rewritten once the entire body has been cleaned, revised. 3. Per WP:INFOBOXREF, the content inside the infobox should be mentioned anywhere else in the body. This is the reason I suggested a separate section. Plus, this information could change in future, so a separate section might always be useful for readers. 4. Providing a new source that clearly mentions the listing date as August 31, 2016. Please use the following:

- Thank you for your assistance. I have replied to some of the points above. Please consider. Convo Agent One (talk) 10:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Request to Update #4
Hello! Suggesting a separate section for two independently notable awards the subject has won. Please consider adding this under a section titled "Awards and recognition" or a suitable alternative.

Thank you for your assistance. Convo Agent One (talk) 11:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply 04-JUN-2019
Regards, Spintendo  02:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The Ernst and Young EOTYA is achieved by an individual, and not necessarily by the company employing that individual. This claim would be more appropriate in an article on Vishwavir Ahuja.
 * The IDRBT Award may be mentioned in the IDRBT article, but it is not referenced there by sources independent of the subject.