Talk:RDTSC

the following from the article seems to be confusingly worded:

"The RDTSC instruction has until recently been an excellent, high-resolution, low-overhead way of gettting CPU timing information. Or at least it has been, until the advent of multi-core, hibernating CPU's, and multiple processors."

parhaps it should be re-worded --Michael Lynn 09:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think this entire article is misplaced. There is already a Wikipedia entry for Time_Stamp_Counter. That article should be the "main" one. Why does "reading" have so much more information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.211.100 (talk) 23:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

RDTSC was already supported by Pentium Pro (It's documented in the programmer's manual). So I changed Pentium II to Pentium Pro. [MarcoMp] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.101.74.252 (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

"Section 18.17.5 for more detail" <= this is obviously copied right from the (copyrighted?) manual; fix it 128.174.237.233 (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)