Talk:RMS Alaunia (1913)

this isnt a copy from the wesite i took another copy from another website the cambot is an error-roadcrusher2
 * It's still a copy though, isn't it! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 02:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry has the right of it. Regardless of where it came from (I found it myself), it's a copyright violation.   Into The Fray   T / C  02:57, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * i promise i will find a way to solve the problem
 * It's OK; i've removed all the offending text. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 03:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, yes. I'd say that'd do it.  Into The Fray   T / C  03:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but we now have a single-sentence A1. Oy vey... --PMDrive1061 03:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe all ships are notable, actually. At least, that's what one admin told me when I tried to CSD an article worse than this one was, but I might be mistaken.  Anyway, I've added a little more context.  It should probably be moved to RMS Alaunia (1913), because there appear to have been ships with the same name after this one, though I might be mistaken about that too.   Into The Fray   T / C  03:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Heck, I agree that ships are notable. Nice save on this one.  I hit it with the speedy tag before I saw the talk page and I was hoping that someone would be alerted to expand this.  Nice save.  :) --PMDrive1061 03:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * With any luck, when he wakes up in the morning, 'Chase him ladies, he's the cavalry' will feel an upwelling of national and naval pride, run out and complete a thorough study of the ship at the local library and flesh this into the next big thing. Until them, I'm kinda shot.   Into The Fray   T / C  04:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Disagree that all ships are notable, but this one probably is because of the mine. -- But | seriously | folks   06:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)