Talk:RTML

I'm removing the link to "# RTML 101: The Unofficial Guide To Yahoo! Store Templates (RTML) RTML 101 is the first and only book covering all aspects of working with and creating custom Yahoo! Store templates. It includes a complete RTML reference with explanations and examples.." because that isn't even true, and this isn't an ad service for advertising your book. Not a worthwhile reference.

I think the link should go back up, or a new article should be written.

The person who took this down is just as bad as the person advertising.

The fact is, RTML information is very scarce and hard to come by.

The person who took the link down doesn't provide any evidence for saying the original poster's statements are not true.

As far as I can tell, "RTML 101: The Unofficial Guide To Yahoo! Store Templates" is at very least the autoritative source for information, if not the 'only book covering all aspects' as the original poster claims.

At any rate, taking down a link and then saying nothing with evidence about why it's gone, and leaving nothing to go by is just as bad as if everything is true that the person taking it down claims. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTML

I found source but it need cleanup ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.123.194 (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)