Talk:R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

The following edit has been removed

"However since the court ruled against workfare the comments regarding the human rights do not form part of the reasons for the judgement and therefore and not legally binding".

This should remain in the article because under English case law only the reasons for the judgement are legally binding. The comment about human rights not being breached would support a ruling in favor of workfare not a ruling against it. — 82.10.108.6 (talk) 12:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)] comment added by 82.10.108.6 (talk) 15:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)