Talk:R v Marshall

Separation
Although it's not needed yet, with some expansion both decisions would probably be worth individual articles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Appearance of bias in article
This article could do with additional references, but also references that expand beyond the commentary provided by Cameron. As a crown lawyer, Cameron's expertise should be (and is) recognized. But it should also recognize that an inherent bias may exist in Cameron's views against the Court's ruling, and should therefore include opposing views. I eat BC Fish (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I have made the article more balanced by removing most of the Alex Cameron material and adding some from the other camp. The article was definitely violating NPOV by citing Alex Cameron so extensively while not citing anyone else. Communpedia Tribal (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute
I have recently created a page on the events in the 2020 Mi'kmaq lobster dispute in Nova Scotia - relating to this article. I was hoping to have some more editors familiar with the subject take a look. CaffeinAddict (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)