Talk:Raúl Corrales Forno

==Notice: This article lacks WP:A to establish == In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Untitled
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

References are not notability in themselves
Please use  templates to format the References you added (as mentioned already) so that they will use standard formatting for display ... and please wikilink the publications.

When you decline a PROD, you should leave a new message on the talk page, not just a misleading edit summary like "Added references to prove notability". &mdash;72.75.72.63 (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)