Talk:Rabbis for Human Rights

Is this wikiarticle part of the A-I conflict?
Sean.hoyland, could you pls clarify rationale behind you placement of Warning Tag? I am just puzzled, I do not think the article has something to do with A-I conflict.--  Jim Fitzgerald   post  16:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm tagging all articles in certain categories with the 1RR and sanctions notifications. I'm picking categories that I think fit within 'the entire set of Arab-Israeli conflict-related articles, broadly interpreted' as it says in the sanctions. In this case the category is Category:Non-governmental organizations involved in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. That is the rationale, it's in the category, it gets the notifications. I usually have a quick look at each article to see whether it's appropriate and in this case I think it is because it involves things that attract problematic editing such as demolition of Palestinian houses and the barrier amongst other things. Does that make sense ?  Sean.hoyland  - talk 16:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Also see here where I asked PhilKnight about this kind of situation where articles are related to the conflict somewhat indirectly.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 16:53, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I am not sure if the article completely fits into A-I, I think only 30%. Why do not we ask the opinions of A-I editors and see what they can say? My point is, that if the article is taken into A-I that would authomatically drag a non A-I editor into the harsh environment, who otherwise was not actually speciically intending to make edits in terms of A-I. In adition, there were not any disputs or edit war in this article. So, I think, it too early to apply the tag to this article. --  Jim Fitzgerald   post  19:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There was no response, so I will be bold and hide the disputed tag.--  Jim Fitzgerald   post  14:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'll put a note about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration/Current Article Issues when I get a chance. I'm pretty sure that it's covered by the 1RR restriction and the sanctions whether the tags are there or not though. Having the tags there just means that people can't say they didn't know about the active arbitration remedies if someone files a report for edit warring or something....not that that is likely in this article it seems.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 15:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's see what wikicommunity thinks. I am open-minded.--  Jim Fitzgerald   post  16:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)