Talk:Rabey Hasani Nadwi/Archive 1

Discussion
There is a dispute about the format of the infobox between two editors. I have put both versions of the infobox in a table above together with some examples of the infoboxes used in biographies of other Islamic leaders. , please can you explain why you think your version is better. -- Toddy1 (talk) 10:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , I support the idea of using religious biography infobox for scholars who don't held any office, but scholars who are in the office, let the officeholder infoboxes be used, as they seem more convenient. We are facing electricity cut-off from more than a week here and I feel strange writing on my mobile phone, I may elaborate my position once I'm back on laptop. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  10:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

I think if a scholar helds a office of a religious seminary or religious organization so religious biography is better Syed Aashir (talk) 16:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Infobox religious biography has all the personal data together.
 * Infobox officeholder (with Infobox religious biography as a module) has been implemented with the person's date and place of birth under Personal details, and all the other personal information under Personal. If we must use this solution, please could we have the birth details handled by the module, so that they appear under personal.
 * -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅ I've fixed that. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  21:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)