Talk:Rabia sign

Rabia-sign a general sign against dictatorship?
Dear all, I would like to contribute against the last paragraph in "Politics" saying: "The sign became common not only among protesters of the Muslim Brotherhood or Islamists in general, but it has been considered to be a sign that indicates call for freedom and putting an end to dictatorships." The references given are by a local journal of Berlin (-> Prenzlauer Berg) and the content is simply not true, only because a reporter said so. The revolutionary Egyptians, who are neither with the actual political regime, nor with the MB are distancing themselves very much from the MB and their rabia-sign. Still they are against dictatorship! I am sorry I can't provide an evidence for this, but an opinion of a reporter is still an opinion and not fact.
 * Hello User:Pianchi, obviously you did not read the source. The cited journal does not quote its own opinion, but that of the "Islam- und Politikwissenschaftler Thorsten Gerald Schneiders". This means, de:Thorsten Gerald Schneiders is not cited as journalist, but as scientist by Christiane Abelein. I don't know which "revolutionary Egyptians" you intended to refer to (e.g. April 6 Youth Movement co-founder Israa Abdel Fattah, even though nominated for Nobel Peace Prize, defended the "state-led massacres of several hundred Islamists over the summer" and said: “Our army should do whatever it wants to kill these terrorists”), but you should use sources indeed, to provide evidence for what you want to have mentioned in the article. Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Rabia sign name as acronym
i think no need for this section the origin of the name is the number four as rabia means "fourth (feminine)" so represented by the number four the four fingers. using 'four' instead of 'A' in "rabia" to become "R4bia" is also to confirm the meaning of four as 'A' resemble '4'.

'Ready For Brotherhood Independent Army' is a fake interpretation of media against rabia sit-in. the first citation is discussing that the interpretation is fake "wrong citation". the second citation from pro-coup channel 'alnahar' with no evidence or any reliable source "unreliable citation". Logiphile (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Cleaned Islamist bias out of this article
Before my edits, this page was heavily biased in favor of the Brotherhood, and looked more like a Start-class article, with tons of puffery, POV, words to watch, and other unwanted things on Wikipedia. Then I came to the article's rescue, cleaning up a large amount of the page's trash and bullshit. Now it looks a lot better than it did before. Why not nominate it for GA status then? Go ahead, expand this article with more information. Zakawer (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)