Talk:Race (sociology)

It has poor, goofy and illiterate English trough out.--86.29.140.158 (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

This may be the worst page I have seen on wikipedia "The Anti-Semitic Nazis attitude towards identifying Jews relied on the nose thing allot!" is a good example of whats wrong. Poor spelling, poor grammar and no citations.


 * Agreed. This article is so bad in parts, it's humorous.


 * "The old ideas about race were swept away along with the prejudices that followed in it's wake!"
 * The exclamation point is, of course, the crowning glory in this particular construction. And this passed AfD? -- Aryaman (talk) 11:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation
Something to keep in mind with this article is disambiguation. It means that the link should be to Korean instead of Korean Korean is a disam page...basically a search page. Links shouldn't go there. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 13:02, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Purpose? Scope?
What, exactly, is worth saving in this article? It appears to be a rich stew of random, mostly unsourced factoids related to a number of topics peppered with questionable claims, rolled in bad grammar and spiced with a healthy dose of exclamation points. Do the folks who voted to save this thing have some kind of plan? If so, please share your thoughts. -- Aryaman (talk) 11:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

it's an involuntarily humourous pov fork of social interpretations of race, redirect there. --dab (𒁳) 12:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)