Talk:Rachael Wiseman

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) importance has been clearly asserted. In addition to the 4+ published works listed, this author's work has already been cited on multiple other wikipedia articles. Take it to AfD if you think the subject lacks notability. Proposing speedy deletion for lack of asserted importance seems tendentious. --Jaredscribe (talk) 02:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * How has importance been clearly asserted? Which multiple Wikipedia articles cite her work? I do see G. E. M. Anscombe. Jay  Diversity icon green.svg 05:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * There's clearly no claim of notability in the article as it stands. It will remain in draft space until it passes review. Deb (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)