Talk:Rachel Sussman

Notability
Could you elaborate on the reason for the notability template on Rachel Sussman? The template asks for reliable secondary sources to be added, but I believe the article already has these. Do you disagree? --Bsherr (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't see from the article any reason why she is notable?  Teapot  george Talk  19:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The article demonstrates that the subject has received significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Doesn't it? --Bsherr (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Many many hundreds of photographers have their work published in assorted magazines it doesn't necessarily make them notable? I'm happy to be proved wrong though.  Teapot  george Talk  19:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)