Talk:Rachel Washburn

Business Wire
removed citations to Business Wire (but leaving the unverified prose), and removed comments about the sorting and exhaustion of sources, saying only&mdash;and repeatedly&mdash;"no buinesswire". WP:PRIMARY says that  The Business Wire source was citing only 8.62% of the article, all of which were straightforward facts of Washburn's (a) first year in the US Army, (b) last year in the US Army, and (c) employers since leaving the Army. This usage is in compliance with WP:PRIMARY.I have reverted Possibly's edits per the above, and this talk section is the "discuss" of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle for anyone so interested. —  Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 13:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are really dead set on using a press release as a source, as opposed to an independent source, go for it.--- Possibly (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Barring access to the latter for the same purposes, I take what I can get. I'm obliged.  —   Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 17:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just a heads-up: with the application of the Fox Business source above, we're down to 6.12% (two citations' worth) of the article hanging on the primary source. —   Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 00:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)