Talk:Radcliff, Kentucky

Why the extra project coverage?
I can halfway understand coverage by WP-KY, even though it's needless dual coverage. But WP-Cities? WP-Cities is a grandparent of WP-Louisville, and I honestly don't see what makes Radcliff, of all small cities, something that needs to be catalogued for the very high-level WP-Cities. Is there something I'm missing? After all, articles aren't catalogued for the sake of being catalogued -- there needs to be a rationale for it, and as little overlap as possible. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, nevermind. WP-Louisville shouldn't even be covering it, as Radcliff isn't in the Louisville MSA. Stevie is the man!  Talk &bull; Work 22:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 03:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)