Talk:Radhika Gajjala

•	What you wrote so far is done well. I did not find any spelling errors and the sentences are worded nicely. •	 It seems she has a good amount of books and journal articles out though. Is there one she is most known for? Perhaps you could highlight one of her pieces. •	I noticed you had a question about the journal articles too. My person has an extensive amount as well. I don’t think you have to list them all but I have this same question. •	 I also noticed the “Fulbright Program” has a Wikipedia page. Perhaps you could link that in the award section. That way it kind of shows how meaningful the award is without you having to explain It. (At least I think it is the same award..) •	I also think the journal articles need a DOI. I still have to add these as well to mine. – Overall, it is a good article!

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MHessMN.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
Leah's review: The intro and education sections were done really well. You did a good job sourcing her notoriety in the intro as well.

I would just make sure to follow the outline that Ann provided when it comes to the headings that you use.

I did notice that you are missing one key noteworthy research publication. I would recommend noting the book, Cyberculture and the Subaltern: Weavings of the Virtual and Real, that you mentioned in the intro of the wiki page. I would then give a description of the book, which would give more insight on what your scholar is interested in and what she studies.

I noticed your comment about the number of journal articles you have and I would recommend adding a few more journal articles that relate to her main areas of studies, but after that I would put the link to the page with all of her published journal articles.

I also noticed that you do not have a reference section with all the sources that you used, but you did a good job sourcing the information throughout the paper. I also don’t see your bibliography, which should be at the end of the wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahrempfert (talk • contribs) 20:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Lots of good comments here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aburnett412 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)