Talk:Radiant Historia

.

Expanding on the Chrono series?
Sentence in question: The game gives a unique take on the concept of non-linear branching storylines, which it combines with the concepts of time travel and parallel universes, expanding on the Chrono series.

While the press and RPG community have zealously identified Radiant Historia with perennial favorite Chrono Trigger, neither Atlus, Square Enix, nor anyone involved with the game has indicated that it is based on the concepts or gameplay of that title. As the gameplay aspect of the time/dimension travel of Radiant Historia has almost nothing in common with Chrono Trigger, and Chrono Trigger was not responsible for inventing the notion of time travel, the connection, popular though it may be, is purely speculative.

That being the case, it should either be documented that 'the game has been likened to the Chrono series', or it should not be documented at all. The current phrasing implies creator intention, of which no evidence has been provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.132.68.146 (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree. It should be re-worded AND given a source because now it's only some editor's original research. Sergecross73   msg me   18:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Oops, reading that part in the article itself, there IS a source for the claim. And I reworded it so it merely says it's "similar" to the Chrono series. That wording, especially with the source, seems correct. Sergecross73   msg me   20:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Wow, the guy who edited Radiant Historia in mid-January about a reprint in March 2012 was actually right... I wonder if it was just coincidence. (Sorry if this is off-topic, I just found this to be very interesting.) --Don&#39;t mess with the ROBOT (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

SPOILERS
Someone should put that there is spoilers in the history section. I got full spoiled myself of the ending. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.35.240.126 (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. See WP:SW. Sorry 'bout that CarniCat (meow) 01:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

It's ok actually.That link gives no advice either way, just discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.181.58 (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah it does. It says spoilers are allowed. They should not be removed or marked as "spoilers" or anything, because this is an encyclopedia. Sergecross73   msg me  10:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)