Talk:Radiant Silvergun/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TheJoebro64 (talk · contribs) 20:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

I'll finish this by the end of the week. JOE BRO  64  20:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Overall, this article is fantastic. I just have a few points: That's all I found. I think your articles get better every time, Tarkus. Nice work. JOE BRO  64  23:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Review
 * I'd link to porting when it is first mentioned in the lead. Same thing goes for development.
 * The story of Radiant Silvergun is told non-linearly through animated videos and scripted dialogue between stages—I think you might need a reference for this, as it's sort of an original claim.
 * The title "Radiant Silvergun" is in reference to an early concept for the game → The title "Radiant Silvergun" is in reference to an early concept for the game
 * None of the publications (CVG, GameSpot, etc.) in the reception section have links to their respective pages.
 * The hyphen in "rerelease" is unneeded. Standard style is to omit the hyphen in "re-" words unless it causes an ambiguous meaning (example: "recover" vs. "re-cover").
 * Thanks for reviewing. I am pretty busy this week irl, but will get to Shade and this when I have some time. May not be until weekend. TarkusAB talk 13:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No rush. Take your time. JOE BRO  64  19:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Done TarkusAB talk 13:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Great! Let's get this promoted. JOE BRO  64  14:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)