Talk:Radical empiricism

Wikipedia definitely needed a page on radical empiricism, so I made one and added the basic information people need to understand what it is about. However, I haven't had the time yet to think much about style and coherence, so be my guest to juggle the article around a bit.

The Toulmin-part is not usually included in a discussion of radical empiricism, but I see it not as original research but rather as an example of what radical empiricism is and isn't about (it isn't idealist).

Stdbrouw 14:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

"flawed" vs. "incomplete"
The third sentence of the article currently reads:

I think it would make more sense if the word "flawed" were replaced with "incomplete", as in the following example:

Italics were added for emphasis, although they're not present in the article itself.   — Demonic Party Hat  talk  19:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)