Talk:Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry

I don't have expertise in medical but do in the engineering/ physics areas involved including 3D imaging/ image processing (including acoustic imaging) The article content has two main groups. Claims of good test results (which I did not evaluate) plus what appears to be a technical explanation on how it works. On the latter, despite appearances, there really is no technical explanation of how it works. A lot of impressive-looking preface type technical information has been included, but the entire core of any description of how it works has been left out. So we have the misleading situation of "appears to have been explained (which would tend to give it technical credibility) but really hasn't". It probably should exist as an article, but needs to be whacked down to what expert independent sources have said.North8000 (talk) 22:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)