Talk:Radioplane RP-77/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * ✅. I'll try to pay better attention to the type of English used, I use pretty much "classical southern American English" in normal useage so sometimes I slip. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. I'll try to pay better attention to the type of English used, I use pretty much "classical southern American English" in normal useage so sometimes I slip. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * ✅. Somehow the Specifications section, which had the refs, got deleted - I've restored it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The citation from the Aeronautical Journal lacks detail. Need page and issue #, plus place of publication. Was there no article title?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I can add the page number and a Google Books link, but issue and article title...those may be harder. The Google Books entry only has a snippet view. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You might try searching using different terms; I've sometimes had good luck with that.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll see if I can get anything done over the holiday. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 21:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, was able to add additional detail to the ref, appears it was printed as a complete year's worth of issues. No evidence of an article title can be found, but I did find enough to verify it, I hope. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll see if I can get anything done over the holiday. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 21:58, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, was able to add additional detail to the ref, appears it was printed as a complete year's worth of issues. No evidence of an article title can be found, but I did find enough to verify it, I hope. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Partially done. Found the type of Lycoming engine in the -77A/C, but nothing on what kind of McCulloch engine. Working on the rest.
 * ✅. There aren't any sources I can find saying what the McCulloch engine was, just that it was a four-cylinder. Might be the O-100, but I can't prove it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Partially done. Found the type of Lycoming engine in the -77A/C, but nothing on what kind of McCulloch engine. Working on the rest.
 * ✅. There aren't any sources I can find saying what the McCulloch engine was, just that it was a four-cylinder. Might be the O-100, but I can't prove it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. There aren't any sources I can find saying what the McCulloch engine was, just that it was a four-cylinder. Might be the O-100, but I can't prove it. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Thanks for the review. I'll get to work on this as soon as I can - there may be a bit of a delay as home internet is being off-and-on at the moment. But I'll get things fixed up ASAP. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)